Case 2602696/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Moran v Authentic Kare Company Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602696/2022
- Decision date
- 3 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Moran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 10 November 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal made findings on the papers and listed no oral hearing outcome because the hearing set for 3 March 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered Authentic Kare Company LTD to pay £4,802.98 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,369.86. The total sum awarded was £6,172.84.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and under rule 21 the Employment Judge determined the claim and ordered payment of £4,802.98 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £4,803 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,369.86. | Upheld | — | £1,370 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,173
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.