Case 2602705/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Abu Bakr v Restek UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602705/2022
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
- Venue
- Nottingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Abu Bakr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Smith sitting alone at Nottingham via CVP on 24 February 2023. The Claimant, Mr M Abu Bakr, appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Miss J Veimou, Litigation Consultant.
The tribunal recorded that, by agreement, the Respondent had paid whatever compensation was due in respect of the Claimant's claim for compensation for accrued but untaken annual leave. That claim was therefore dismissed upon its withdrawal.
The remaining claim was for breach of contract concerning pay on 12 May and 1 June 2022. That claim was dismissed. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment says this claim for compensation for accrued but untaken annual leave was dismissed upon its withdrawal after it was agreed that the Respondent had paid whatever compensation was due. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was in relation to the Claimant's pay on 12 May and 1 June 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.