Case 2602715/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Palmer v Coalville Cleaning Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602715/2021
- Decision date
- 28 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Palmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 February 2022, the Tribunal gave Mrs R Palmer an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why her complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract should not be struck out. The reason given was that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 October 2021 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
Mrs Palmer did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Welch therefore struck out both the unfair dismissal and breach of contract complaints. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 26 October 2021 and did not actively pursue the complaint; no sufficient representations were made after the letter dated 16 February 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Struck out for the same reasons as the unfair dismissal complaint: non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 26 October 2021 and lack of active pursuit; no sufficient representations were made after the letter dated 16 February 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.