Case 2602716/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Amy Vipond Second Claimant: Miss Shannon Bagnall v Chartley Groundworks — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602716/2023
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Amy Vipond Second Claimant: Miss Shannon Bagnall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. It therefore determined the claims without a response from the respondent. For the first claimant, Mrs Amy Vipond, the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages, found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment, and found that her holiday entitlement had not been paid.
The first claimant was awarded £9,186.68 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages, £9,010.00 for redundancy pay, and £2,968.00 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment records these as separate awards and does not set out any additional remedy headings such as compensatory award, injury to feelings, or interest.
For the second claimant, Miss Shannon Bagnall, the tribunal made awards for unauthorised deductions from wages and for unpaid holiday entitlement. The text of paragraphs 5 and 6 refers to 'the first claimant', but the case heading and numbering show that these awards are for the second claimant. The amounts awarded were £4,079.07 gross and £627.61 gross respectively. The total of the awards set out in the judgment is £25,871.36.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant, Mrs Amy Vipond. | Upheld | — | £9,187 |
| Redundancy | First claimant, Mrs Amy Vipond; the tribunal found she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £9,010 |
| Holiday pay | First claimant, Mrs Amy Vipond. | Upheld | — | £2,968 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant, Miss Shannon Bagnall. Paragraph 5 says 'the first claimant', but the heading and case numbering indicate this award is for the second claimant. | Upheld | — | £4,079 |
| Holiday pay | Second claimant, Miss Shannon Bagnall. Paragraph 6 says 'the first claimant', but the heading and case numbering indicate this award is for the second claimant. | Upheld | — | £628 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,871
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.