Case 2602723/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Toma v Matt Tyler Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602723/2021
- Decision date
- 13 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Toma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 October 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that the claim had not been actively pursued because the claimant had not applied to have the respondent restored to the register, and/or that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because a claim cannot proceed against a company that no longer exists.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Adkinson struck out the claim on 13 October 2022. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits, liability, or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because the respondent company no longer existed. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.