Case 2602725/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Peck v Anthoney Hayre — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602725/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Peck
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short Rule 21 judgment dated 4 December 2019 by Employment Judge Britton Date. The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, which was listed for 30 January 2020 and reduced to one hour starting at 10am.
The extracted PDF text does not set out substantive findings, reasons, or any quantified award. The claim heads are taken from the gov.uk listing as breach of contract and unfair dismissal; on the available text both are recorded as successful, but the judgment itself does not separate the heads or explain the basis of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment refers only to 'the claim'; this head is taken from the gov.uk listing category, and the judgment leaves remedy to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment refers only to 'the claim'; this head is taken from the gov.uk listing category, and the judgment leaves remedy to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.