Case 2602731/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Codd v Lincolnshire County Couriers Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602731/2020
- Decision date
- 23 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richard Phillips
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Codd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Codd succeeded on all three claims before Employment Judge Richard Phillips sitting alone at Nottingham by CVP on 23 November 2020. The Respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £117.46 gross in respect of the amounts deducted.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement in accordance with Regulation 14(4) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £440.62 gross. In addition, it found that the Respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment in accordance with section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and made an award of £766.30 pursuant to section 38 Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £117.46 for unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £117 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the Respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement in accordance with Regulation 14(4) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered £440.62 gross. | Upheld | — | £441 |
| Other | The tribunal found a failure to provide written particulars of employment under section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £766.30 pursuant to section 38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £766 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,324
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.