Case 2602750/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Abdulahi Damilola Lawal v Recon Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602750/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Abdulahi Damilola Lawal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Abdulahi Damilola Lawal’s case against Recon Services Ltd was listed for hearing at Nottingham on 6 December 2019 before Employment Judge Jeram sitting alone. Neither party attended, but the judgment records that the claimant had not appeared by 2.25pm and had provided no explanation for his non-appearance.
In those circumstances, and exercising the tribunal’s powers under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The extracted judgment does not record any determination on the substantive merits of the underlying complaint(s), and it does not identify any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action in the extracted text. It states that, because the claimant did not appear by 2.25pm and gave no explanation, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.