Case 2602753/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael John Pepper v Ascus Pumps Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602753/2018
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Michael John Pepper
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Ahmed recorded that the claimant, Mr Michael John Pepper, brought a claim against Ascus Pumps Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and that the claim succeeds. The judgment does not specify the precise legal basis of the claim in the extracted text, and it does not set out findings of fact beyond the default judgment outcome.
The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 30 September 2019. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment, and no split between heads of loss is provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment. The text does not identify the specific claim type or types, only that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.