Case 2602757/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Telec Utilities Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602757/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Members
- Panel members
- Mr S Conor, Mr A Wood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely by Cloud Video Platform at Midlands (East) Region from 1 November to 3 November 2021. The claimant, B, appeared in person and the respondent, Telec Utilities Ltd, was represented by counsel. The tribunal was chaired by Employment Judge Hutchinson with lay members Mr S Conor and Mr A Wood.
The unanimous judgment was that the claim of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. The tribunal also found that the claim of whistleblowing detriment failed and was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No separate remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records this as a claim of whistleblowing detriment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.