Case 2602765/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Tocinska v Alloga UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602765/2021
- Decision date
- 1 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Welch
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Tocinska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge K Welch, sitting alone in Nottingham on 1 December 2022, the tribunal decided the preliminary issue of whether Mrs E Tocinska was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal found that she was a disabled person at all material times. The written judgment records that conclusion without setting out a broader merits decision on any discrimination or unfair dismissal complaints.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment, and the decision is confined to the preliminary disability question.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | At this open preliminary hearing, the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at all material times. The written record does not determine any substantive disability discrimination liability or record any remedy. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.