Case 2602776/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sufrini v G-Force Scaffolding Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602776/2021
- Decision date
- 27 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sufrini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Nottingham Employment Tribunals on 2 November 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing for 25 March 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered G-Force Scaffolding Ltd to pay Mr M Sufrini £725.40 gross. No separate findings, deductions, or additional remedy components are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay £725.40 gross. It was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £725 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £725
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.