Case 2602777/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss KF Scarfe v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602777/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss KF Scarfe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. It recorded that the claimant had not complied with requirement 1.1 of an order made at a preliminary hearing on 30 January 2020 and sent to the parties on 8 February 2020, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant had failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued or why the order had not been complied with. The hearing listed for 15, 17 and 18 February 2021 was therefore cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim' is struck out for failure to comply with an order and failure to make sufficient representations. It does not identify the substantive causes of action in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.