Case 2602810/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Fletcher v Consistent Quality Support Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602810/2021
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Fletcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 March 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 17 November 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant responded that he was happy for the case to be struck out. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No determination was made on the substantive merits of any underlying complaint, and the hearing listed for 6 April 2022 did not take place.
The judgment records no remedy, no findings on liability, and no separate legal test beyond the strike-out process described in the reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with an order dated 17 November 2021 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.