Case 2602846/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Miss M Hopkins v Craft Ales & Cocktails — 2022

Case reference: 2602846/2021
Decision date: 8 February 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Clark Date

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss M Hopkins

Respondent

Craft Ales & Cocktails

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 8 February 2022, Employment Judge Clark gave a Rule 21 judgment after the claim was issued on 18 November 2021 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the claimant's claims succeed, but it does not set out separate findings on the underlying complaints or any monetary award.

The tribunal listed a remedy hearing at Nottingham on 21 February 2022, with a one-day estimate, to determine the claimant's remedy. The judgment also states that case management orders would follow separately.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 21 default judgment; the written record states that the claims succeed but gives no separate findings or award for this complaint.	Upheld	—	—
Working time regulations	Rule 21 default judgment; the written record states that the claims succeed but gives no separate findings or award for this complaint.	Upheld	—	—
Other	This captures the written pay statement complaint reflected in the case listing; the written record states that the claims succeed but does not give a separate finding or award.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.