Case 2602852/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Twells v EM Woodturning Limited (Insolvent) c/o Opus Restructuring and Insolvency — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602852/2021
- Decision date
- 12 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phillips
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Twells
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing in Nottingham on 12 May 2023, the case was heard by Employment Judge Phillips sitting alone. The claimant, Mr P Twells, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal disposed of four claim items. The claimant's notice/redundancy pay claim was recorded as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded, and the tribunal ordered EM Woodturning Limited (Insolvent) c/o Opus Restructuring and Insolvency to pay Mr Twells the gross sum of £1008.
The holiday pay claim was dismissed because it had been brought out of time. The separate claim for pension contributions was also dismissed. No further factual findings or reasons are set out in the written record beyond those outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment refers to this item as the claimant's 'notice/redundancy pay' claim and records that it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1008. | Upheld | — | £1,008 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was brought out of time and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim for pension contributions was dismissed; the written record gives no further reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,008
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.