Case 2602861/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Johnson v 4 Life Healthcare Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602861/2021
- Decision date
- 31 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The claim was issued in the Midlands East Region of the Employment Tribunals on 14 November 2021, and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Ahmed Date recorded that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds, but it does not identify the individual causes of action or explain the factual basis for success. It also records that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.
No monetary award is set out in this judgment. The text gives the remedy hearing date as 25 March 2021 at 10.00am, which appears inconsistent with the issue date and judgment date and is therefore recorded here only as extracted.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the individual heads of claim; it states only that the claim succeeds under rule 21. The remedy hearing date is given as 25 March 2021, which appears inconsistent with the issue date of 14 November 2021 and the judgment date of 31 January 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.