Case 2602862/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Del Busso v Paul’s Catering Butchers Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602862/2021
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millns Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Del Busso
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was for unlawful deduction from wages only. Employment Judge Millns heard the case at Nottingham on 25 March 2022. The claimant, Mr L Del Busso, appeared in person and the respondent, Paul’s Catering Butchers Limited, was represented by its owner, Mr Paul Minarik.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay Mr Del Busso the gross sum of £199.50. No separate findings, split award, or additional remedy components are recorded in the written decision provided.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text does not identify any further legal test or detailed factual reasoning beyond the success of the wages claim and the amount awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £199.50. | Upheld | — | £200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.