Case 2602892/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v LTE Services Ltd (in liquidation) and others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602892/2022
- Decision date
- 13 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Leicester via CVP on 21 November 2023 before Employment Judge Ahmed, sitting alone. The claimant was represented by a solicitor and the respondents had no appearance or representation. The judgment states that the respondents are jointly and severally ordered to pay the claimant £18,404.76 net, and that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.
The written record sets out an award for discrimination comprising £404.28 for loss of earnings, £15,000 for injury to feelings, and £1,446.48 interest. It also records awards under unlawful deduction of wages for unpaid commission of £600 and outstanding holiday pay of £954. The judgment text gives the awards and total, but does not set out written reasons beyond the schedule because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record refers only to an award for discrimination; the disability classification is taken from the official gov.uk listing metadata. The award comprised £404.28 loss of earnings, £15,000 for injury to feelings, and £1,446.48 interest. | Upheld | Disability | £16,851 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £600 for unpaid commission and £954 for outstanding holiday pay under unlawful deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £1,554 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,405
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,958
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.