Case 2602915/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr K Lalli (2) Mr M Sturgess v Asda Stores Limited FINAL HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602915/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Members
- Venue
- Nottingham
- Panel members
- Mr J Akhtar, Mr J Purkis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr K Lalli (2) Mr M Sturgess
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the final hearing at Nottingham from 27 to 31 March 2023 before Employment Judge Camp, sitting with members Mr J Akhtar and Mr J Purkis. The claimants were Mr K Lalli and Mr M Sturgess, and the respondent was Asda Stores Limited.
The written judgment is brief and records only the outcome. It states that all of the claimants' complaints failed and were dismissed. No separate findings of liability, no compensatory or other monetary award, and no split between claims are set out in the written record.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that all of the claimants' complaints failed and were dismissed; no separate outcome was given for individual complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all of the claimants' complaints failed and were dismissed; no separate outcome was given for individual complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all of the claimants' complaints failed and were dismissed; no separate outcome was given for individual complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.