Case 2602927/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Tristram v House Buyer Bureau Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602927/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Tristram
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss K Tristram's unfair dismissal complaint because section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service and the claimant had less than two years' service with House Buyer Bureau Limited. The judgment records that she was therefore not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant had been given the opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but did not give an acceptable reason. It accordingly struck out the unfair dismissal claim. The judgment expressly stated that it did not affect the claimant's disability discrimination claim, and that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 ERA 1996 because the claimant had less than two years' service. The judgment stated that it did not affect the claimant's disability discrimination claim or other complaints. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.