Case 2602941/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Beasley v Fairgrove Homes Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602941/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Beasley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in Nottingham on 23 October 2020, before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone, the respondent did not appear. The tribunal gave judgment for the claimant on the monetary claims recorded in the decision, including breach of contract, redundancy pay, unlawful deductions of wages, unfair dismissal, and holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered £958.90 for notice pay, £1,438.35 as a redundancy payment, £481.59 for pension contributions, £1,262.15 for commission, and £1,350.00 in relation to the failure to provide a company vehicle. It also awarded £3,508.45 compensation for unfair dismissal and £2,403.85 for holiday entitlement. The judgment records that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded in the sum of £958.90. | Upheld | — | £959 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded in the sum of £1,438.35. | Upheld | — | £1,438 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction of wages for pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £482 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction of wages for commission. | Upheld | — | £1,262 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction of wages for failure to provide a company vehicle. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
| Unfair dismissal | Compensation awarded for unfair dismissal; the judgment states that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply. | Upheld | — | £3,508 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement awarded in the sum of £2,403.85. | Upheld | — | £2,404 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,403
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,508
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.