Case 2602945/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Aimmua v United Response — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602945/2020
- Decision date
- 22 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Aimmua
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 12 May 2021, the tribunal gave Mr P Aimmua an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to be actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify any specific cause of action in the text supplied. It records only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.