Case 2602946/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Brader v Michael Frazer Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602946/2022
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Brader
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 12 December 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent also presented no mitigation.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; tribunal awarded 4 weeks' pay subject to the statutory weekly cap. | Upheld | — | £2,284 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £6,923 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £17,308 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,885 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,399
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.