Case 2602948/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Atkinson v Michael Frazer Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602948/2022
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Atkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 12 December 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a rule 21 determination. The judgment records that the respondent presented no mitigation.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars and awarded four weeks' pay, subject to the statutory cap, in the sum of £1,576.92. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,730.76 gross.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,899.02 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,971.15 gross. The hearing listed for 27 March 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Award for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; the tribunal said 4 weeks' pay was just and equitable, subject to the statutory cap. | Upheld | — | £1,577 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £4,731 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £6,899 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,971 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,178
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.