Case 2602956/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Anderson v 1) PWS Realisations Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) 2) Premier Trade Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602956/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Anderson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short Rule 21 judgment dated 31 October 2019, issued by Employment Judge Batten Date. Mr M Anderson succeeded against PWS Realisations Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Premier Trade Limited on three heads of claim, and the judgment records only the resulting orders.
The tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,326.51. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,201.43.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondents had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,467.62. The judgment does not set out further reasoning or any separate breakdown of the total amounts beyond those stated orders.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,327 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages in that amount. | Upheld | — | £2,201 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondents had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,468 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,996
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.