Case 2602998/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Gross and Mrs J Gross v Shephards Bakers Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602998/2021
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Gross and Mrs J Gross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Lincoln on 28 March 2022, Employment Judge R Hutchinson sitting alone recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties in cases 2602998/2021 and 2602999/2021. The respondent was to pay the claimants £10,628.30 in full and final settlement of all claims made to the tribunal.
The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claims. It states that the claims were withdrawn and dismissed, and it records no findings on liability, no legal analysis, and no split of the settlement sum between any individual claim heads.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed between the parties, with the respondent to pay £10,628.30 in full and final settlement of all claims made by the claimants. The claims were then withdrawn and dismissed; no merits findings are given. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed between the parties, with the respondent to pay £10,628.30 in full and final settlement of all claims made by the claimants. The claims were then withdrawn and dismissed; no merits findings are given. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,628
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.