Case 2603004/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Yasmin Braithwaite v Ministry of Defence — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603004/2021
- Decision date
- 10 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Yasmin Braithwaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing, the claimant's claim based on disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal. The claim based on non-payment of outstanding holiday pay was also dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal did not determine the proposed unfair dismissal issue at this hearing. It deferred determination of whether that claim could proceed, noting that the current claim would require two years' qualifying service which the claimant did not have, and that the claimant intended to apply to amend and particularise a whistleblowing-based unfair dismissal claim. The breach of contract/failure to pay outstanding wages claim was also deferred for further discussion following further and better particularisation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim pursuant to the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim based upon non-payment of outstanding holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.