Case 2603030/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Harper and others v Alliance Healthcare Management Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603030/2022
- Decision date
- 30 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Harper and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case at a preliminary hearing by reference to the parties’ agreed list of issues. It held that the claimants, who were all drivers, could not rely on the Alloga Staff Handbook 2017 for overtime or bank holiday enhancements because that handbook applied to warehouse staff, while drivers were covered by separate contractual and handbook provisions.
On overtime, the tribunal found that the contractual documents for drivers measured working time by reference to a guaranteed 48-hour week with overtime up to 60 hours in a week, not by daily hours. It therefore rejected the contention that the claimants were entitled to overtime pay upon exceeding prescribed daily hours. On bank holiday working, it likewise found no entitlement for drivers to an enhanced rate under the 2017 staff handbook.
On CPC training, the tribunal found that refresher training was a legal requirement for HGV drivers personally and that the respondent offered training sessions but did not direct claimants to attend any particular session, or necessarily to attend the respondent’s own sessions at all. Drivers could train elsewhere or may already have completed the training. The tribunal therefore concluded that the claimants were not directed by management instruction to undertake the training and dismissed the wages claims. The holiday pay claims, which depended on the alleged underpayments, were also dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This covered the pleaded deductions issues relating to overtime, bank holiday working and CPC training. An earlier break-times deductions claim had been withdrawn before this judgment and was not adjudicated. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint was advanced as consequential on the alleged underpayments for overtime, bank holidays and CPC training; no separate entitlement issue was determined beyond those underlying claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.16 Working Time Regulations
- s.179(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- apt for incorporation
- objective contractual construction
- working time test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.