Case 2603051/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Ellie Jablonski v Local Fundraising limited In Voluntary Liquidation — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603051/2021
- Decision date
- 9 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Ellie Jablonski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge recorded that a determination could properly be made without a response, and that re-service was not required because the liquidator had not been appointed and the address for service changed only after the response time limit had already expired.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, and it ordered payment of £1,154 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £288.50.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,100. The judgment records no separate reduction, apportionment, or additional remedy beyond these sums, which together make the total award of £2,542.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,154 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £288.50. | Upheld | — | £289 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,100. | Upheld | — | £1,100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,543
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.