Case 2603055/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Day v A.N.I. Healthcare Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603055/2021
- Decision date
- 1 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Varnam Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Day
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Day worked for A.N.I. Healthcare Services Ltd as a kitchen assistant from 21 November 2014. At the hearing she pursued only her claim for a payment in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal accepted that she worked fixed but varying hours averaging 30 per week, was paid £8.91 per hour, and had not taken any annual leave during 2021 because she was off sick for most of that year and had been suspended for part of it.
The tribunal rejected her case that 96 hours of 2020 leave had carried over into 2021. Kimberley Hall, a senior care worker, had told the claimant that Ms Khelie had said holiday could be carried over, but the tribunal found that Ms Hall had neither actual nor apparent authority to bind the respondent on that issue. It also held that regulation 13(10) of the Working Time Regulations did not assist, because the evidence did not show that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to take her 2020 leave during that leave year because of the impact of coronavirus.
For 2021, the tribunal applied the averaging approach under sections 221 to 224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and treated the claimant's average working week as 30 hours. On that basis it found that she accrued 112 hours' leave in 2021. It rejected the respondent's figure of 44 hours and rejected the proposed set-off based on the handbook notice clause and alleged agency costs of £1,348.02, because no loss was proved and the clause only applied, if at all, to contractual holiday above the statutory minimum. The tribunal therefore awarded the claimant £997.92 gross, calculated as 112 hours at £8.91 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim pursued at hearing as a regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998 claim for payment in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave. The claimant did not pursue the other pleaded heads at the hearing. | Upheld | — | £998 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £998
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 13(10) Working Time Regulations 1998
- sections 221 to 224 Employment Rights Act 1996
- actual and apparent authority
- First Energy (UK) Ltd v Hungarian International Bank Ltd [1993] BCC 533
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.