Case 2603059/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D R Rajadurai v Saagar Restaurant — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603059/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D R Rajadurai
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 6 December 2021 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore dealt with the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and made a determination on the papers. The hearing listed for 22 April 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Saagar Restaurant had made unauthorised deductions from Miss D R Rajadurai's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £178.20 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered damages of £178.20 for that breach. The judgment does not record any additional remedy components such as interest or a separate breakdown beyond those two amounts.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £178.20 gross under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £178 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £178.20. | Upheld | — | £178 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £356
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.