Case 2603086/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Marie Anderson v Alaskan Ice Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603086/2021
- Decision date
- 8 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Marie Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 14 December 2021 and the respondent failed to present a valid response in time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 4 May 2022 was cancelled.
On the substance of the claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,415.37.
The tribunal also declared that the respondent had failed to provide itemised statements of pay in breach of s.8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate award was made for that declaration.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,415.37. | Upheld | — | £1,415 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the respondent failed to provide itemised statements of pay in breach of s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996, but made no separate award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,415
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.