Case 2603087/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Handley v Tatenhill Aviation Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603087/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Handley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone in Nottingham on 16 December 2020. The only matters recorded in the written judgment were the claimant's claims for a redundancy payment and for notice pay.
The tribunal recorded that Mr Handley withdrew both claims. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the redundancy payment claim and the notice pay claim. No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or monetary award were recorded in the written judgment.
The judgment was dated 11 January 2021. No legal test was set out in the written record, and no lay members sat with the judge.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant withdrew the redundancy payment claim at the hearing and the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant withdrew the notice pay claim at the hearing and the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.