Case 2603088/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Mulligan v The Knife & Cork Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603088/2021
- Decision date
- 30 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Mulligan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Mulligan brought a claim for £533.54 in accrued but unpaid holiday pay said to have arisen during his employment as a kitchen porter. He said he had accrued 63.82 hours of holiday from 1 April 2021 to 6 August 2021, payable at £8.36 per hour. The Respondent denied the claim, saying he had taken holiday during that period and had been paid for it, and that the omission from the payslips was an accounting error.
The case was heard remotely on 30 May 2022 before Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone. The Claimant complied with the Tribunal's case management orders and produced payslips, a breakdown of the sum claimed, and a witness statement stating that he had taken no holiday. The Respondent ignored the orders and did not attend the hearing. The Tribunal recorded that its conduct of the case had been given to Mr Oliver Cleve, who told the clerk that he would not be attending and had no interest in the case.
The Claimant's evidence was not challenged. On that basis, the Tribunal gave judgment for the Claimant and ordered the Respondent to pay the gross sum of £533.54 in respect of accrued holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £534 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £534
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.