Case 2603089/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J South & Others v Raleigh Learning Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603089/2021
- Decision date
- 12 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J South & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Blackwell, sitting alone at Nottingham on 31 August 2022, dealing with applications to amend the claim forms. Miss South sought to add a new direct race discrimination claim, contending that the detriments at paragraphs 47 and 48 were less favourable treatment because of her mixed heritage race. Miss Stewart sought to add to her existing race discrimination case by alleging that the detriments at paragraph 41 were less favourable treatment because she is White compared with a hypothetical comparator.
The tribunal applied the Selkent principles and had regard to the guidance in Ladbrokes Racing Limited v Traynor. It accepted the claimants' submission that the factual basis in both cases remained the same and that no new witnesses or other players were needed for the amendments. The judge accepted that the applications were made late, with no explanation for why they had not been made earlier, but noted that the race issue already ran through the pleadings and that the respondent would suffer only limited additional cost in dealing with the new allegations.
The tribunal also found that there was no material risk that relevant evidence had been lost or reduced in quality. It took no view on the merits of the proposed amendments, saying they were fact dependent, but concluded that on balance it was right to permit both amendments. The judgment therefore allowed the amendments for both claimants and did not determine the substantive merits of any discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Miss South's application to amend was allowed so she could add a direct race discrimination allegation based on mixed heritage race. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Miss Stewart's application to amend was allowed so she could add an allegation that the detriments at paragraph 41 amounted to less favourable treatment because of race. | Upheld | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Selkent principles
- Ladbrokes Racing Limited v Traynor guidance
- just and equitable extension principle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.