Case 2603102/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Bowen-Jones v Timothy Lock T/A Woodborough Hall — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603102/2020
- Decision date
- 15 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Bowen-Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 May 2021, the tribunal gave Miss C Bowen-Jones an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 15 June 2021 would not take place. No findings on the merits were made and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify this head of claim separately, but the case was listed by the tribunal under unlawful deduction from wages and working time and the entire claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify this head of claim separately, but the case was listed by the tribunal under unlawful deduction from wages and working time and the entire claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.