Case 2603117/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Nicholl v Ministry of Defence and 4 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603117/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Ms E Nicholl
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short oral judgment heard on 21 August 2024 before Employment Judge Brewer at Midlands East by CVP. The claimant was represented by Mr P Gilroy KC and the respondents were represented by counsel or a solicitor for the respective parties.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. It also recorded that the claimant’s direct race discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. No findings on the merits of either claim are set out in the written record.
The written judgment notes that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states: 'The claimant’s claim of direct sex discrimination is dismissed on withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states: 'The claimant’s claim of direct race discrimination is dismissed on withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.