Case 2603123/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Brown v Johnson Service Group plc Johnson Workwear Limited Johnson Textile Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2603123/2022
- Decision date
- 16 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brewer sitting at Nottingham on 16 March 2023 recorded that the claimant's claims against Johnson Service Group Plc and Johnson Workwear Limited were dismissed on withdrawal, and those respondents were dismissed from the proceedings. The short written judgment does not set out any merits findings for those claims.
The judgment also records that the claimant's claim for indirect disability discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. No monetary award was made, and the decision states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant's claims against Johnson Service Group Plc and Johnson Workwear Limited were dismissed on withdrawal and that those respondents were dismissed from the proceedings. The short written decision does not identify the specific cause of action for those claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for indirect disability discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.