Case 2603145/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Booth v Mr Mustards Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603145/2023
- Decision date
- 14 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Booth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Nottingham on 14 October 2024, Employment Judge McTigue sat alone and heard Miss A Booth's claims against Mr Mustards Limited. The respondent did not attend. The written judgment records that the breach of contract complaint about notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant, and the complaint for unpaid holiday pay was also dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant.
The tribunal further found that the Claimant did not make a protected disclosure, so the whistleblowing complaint failed. No financial award is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy is set out for any of the complaints.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint in relation to notice pay; the judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint for unpaid holiday pay; the judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal found that the Claimant did not make a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.