Case 2603152/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Payne v Key Electrical Solutions Ltd (t/a Key Electrical) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603152/2020
- Decision date
- 19 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Payne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs G Payne brought a breach of contract claim against Key Electrical Solutions Ltd (t/a Key Electrical) arising from a contract term that the Respondent would pay the fee for a postgraduate course leading to a diploma. The Tribunal noted that the Claimant enrolled with Bangor University and successfully completed the course, and that neither the existence of the contract nor the course arrangement was disputed.
The issue was whether Bangor had been paid the two outstanding invoices, dated 24 November 2017 and 2 October 2018, each for £2,082. The Tribunal accepted that Martin Key said he had paid £4,164 by bank transfer on 29 May 2020 and had produced a payment instruction document, but it found that the payment reference did not identify the Bangor invoice numbers and was described as "Grace Uni". Bangor's accounts contact, Nia, could not trace the payment despite repeated enquiries, and the Respondent did not provide a bank statement or other evidence showing the payment had cleared to Bangor.
Applying the balance of probabilities, the Tribunal was not persuaded that Bangor had received the payment. It therefore found the Respondent in breach of its contract with the Claimant and awarded damages of £4,164.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,164 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,164
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.