Case 2603153/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Pointer v Visor Associates Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603153/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R Pointer
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 17 December 2021 and the respondents did not present a response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a Rule 21 determination on the papers and found that a determination could properly be made in respect of the claim, or part of it.
The tribunal held that Visor Associates Limited and Strays of Oakham Ltd were jointly liable for unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered them to pay Miss R Pointer £664.69 gross.
The tribunal also held that the respondents were jointly liable for failing to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered them to pay £572.50 in respect of that claim. The hearing listed for 22 April 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the respondents were jointly liable for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered to pay £664.69 gross. | Upheld | — | £665 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondents were jointly liable for failing to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered to pay £572.50. | Upheld | — | £573 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,237
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.