Case 2603155/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Morgan v Rolec Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603155/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge, sitting alone at Lincoln on 30 June 2021, held that Mr T Morgan was unfairly dismissed by Rolec Services Ltd. The tribunal ordered a basic award of £7,119.06 and a compensatory award of £4,168.60, giving a total award for unfair dismissal of £11,287.22. The judgment also records that the recoupment Regulations did not apply.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered compensation of £3,668.16. No separate reasons are set out in the extracted judgment beyond the tribunal's conclusions and the remedy awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered a basic award of £7,119.06 and a compensatory award of £4,168.60, making a total award for unfair dismissal of £11,287.22. The recoupment Regulations did not apply. | Upheld | — | £11,287 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered compensation of £3,668.16. | Upheld | — | £3,668 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,955
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,119
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,169
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.