Case 2603166/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Bricknell v Custom Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603166/2020
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Bricknell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Bricknell brought claims against Custom Group Limited for unlawful deductions, a redundancy payment, and unfair dismissal. The unlawful deductions claim was recorded as dismissed on withdrawal, so the tribunal did not determine it on the merits.
The redundancy payment claim failed because the claimant had less than two years' continuous service at the effective date of termination, which meant she did not meet the qualifying requirement in s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The unfair dismissal claim also failed because the claimant had less than two years' continuous service at the effective date of termination, so the ordinary unfair dismissal protection in s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 did not apply. The tribunal further found that the dismissal was not for a reason falling within s.108(2), (3), (4) or (5), so no exception to the qualifying period was engaged.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unlawful deductions claim was 'dismissed on withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant had less than 2 years' continuous service at the effective date of termination, as required by s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant had less than 2 years' continuous service at the effective date of termination, as required by s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996, and the tribunal found she was not dismissed for a reason falling within s.108(2), (3), (4) or (5). | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108(5) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.