Case 2603170/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Graham in person (by CVP) For the v Mr Ben Healey T/a The Blue Bell Inn — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603170/2020
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Graham in person (by CVP) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent's public house as front of house staff under a verbal contract which began as a 40-hour apprenticeship from 23 October 2019. The tribunal found that her hours were reduced in January 2020 to 30 per week, that this variation was accepted, and that her hourly rate remained £5. When the pub closed during the first Covid-19 lockdown, the parties agreed an informal furlough arrangement under which the claimant would be paid 80% of contracted pay, or £120 per week, and could still be called in to work from time to time.
On the evidence, the tribunal accepted the respondent's payment schedule and found that some weeks' work had been paid at the normal hourly rate of £5, but that the balance due under the informal furlough arrangement had not been paid. The tribunal found that for the relevant 15-week period the claimant was entitled to £1,916.84 in total, had received £584.20, and therefore suffered an unlawful deduction of £1,332.64. It ordered that sum to be paid. The tribunal recorded that there was no further claim for consequential loss.
The claimant also argued that the whole calculation should have been based on a 40-hour working week by reference to her apprenticeship agreement. The tribunal rejected that further limb. It found that any complaint about the January 2020 change to 30 hours was out of time, and that in any event the variation had been accepted by performance rather than expressly rejected. The decision was therefore limited to the successful unlawful deduction claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant was owed unpaid wages arising from an informal furlough arrangement and that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction of £1,332.64. The claimant also advanced an alternative basis that her pay should have been calculated on a 40-hour week; that further limb was dismissed as out of time and, in any event, as having been accepted by performance. | Upheld | — | £1,333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,333
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- not reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.