Case 2603172/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JA Townsend v Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603172/2019
- Decision date
- 6 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JA Townsend
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr JA Townsend.
No substantive findings were made on the underlying allegations. The case listing identified disability discrimination and unlawful deduction from wages as the categories of claim, but the judgment itself does not decide those issues on their merits.
The only recorded outcome is dismissal of the proceedings after withdrawal. No remedy was awarded or assessed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give a separate substantive determination on this claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give a separate substantive determination on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.