Case 2603200/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mwando v Gearys Bakery — 2023
- Case reference
- 2603200/2022
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mwando
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 7 July 2023, Employment Judge M Butler struck out the claim in case numbers 2603200/2022 and 2603203/2022 against Gearys Bakery. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 29 June 2023, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order of 25 January 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive claim type and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is headed with case numbers 2603200/2022 and 2603203/2022, but the extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The tribunal struck out the claim after inviting representations on 29 June 2023 about non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 25 January 2023 and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.