Case 2603206/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Bradbury v Cubone Limited t/a Planet Bounce — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603206/2020
- Decision date
- 22 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Bradbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Bradbury was employed by Cubone Limited t/a Planet Bounce from 18 December 2019 until she resigned with immediate effect on 20 July 2020. The parties agreed that she had accrued 15.5 days' holiday by termination. The dispute was whether the furlough letter sent on 6 April 2020 was a legally enforceable written agreement that varied the Working Time Regulations so that some or all of that leave was treated as taken during furlough.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued holiday pay on termination under the Working Time Regulations. The Tribunal found the 6 April 2020 furlough letter was not a sufficiently clear relevant agreement to displace regulation 15 notice/specification requirements or to deem the claimant to have taken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £1,054 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,054
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- regulation 2 WTR relevant agreement
- regulation 13 WTR annual leave entitlement
- regulation 14 WTR payment in lieu on termination
- regulation 15 WTR notice and specification requirements
- Industrial and Commercial Maintenance Limited v Briffa
- Smith v Npower Yorkshire Limited
- Puri v Interlinks Ltd
- Russell v Transocean International Resources Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.