Case 2603211/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Petrov v Rainham Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603211/2022
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr O Petrov
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns only the claimant's application for reconsideration of the tribunal's earlier judgment of 6 June 2024. The application was sent to the parties by email on 6 June 2024, and the tribunal found that the claimant did not present his application until 12 August 2024, well outside the 14-day time limit. The claimant's explanation was that he had been travelling, working on repairs, and later overseas, but the tribunal treated the core issue as whether there was any good reason for the delay.
Employment Judge Adkinson found that the claimant had access to email and the internet and that there was no technical reason preventing him from seeing the order earlier. The tribunal noted that the claimant said he had not checked his emails for some time and described this as human error. It held that the delay was significant, the application should have been made by 20 June 2024, and there was no good reason to disapply the time limit.
In deciding whether to extend time, the tribunal applied the overriding objective and weighed finality, delay, and the effect on the respondents and tribunal resources. It concluded that extending time would promote delay and could require the respondents to deal with an application they might reasonably have thought would not arise. The application for reconsideration was therefore dismissed and the earlier judgment stood.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant's application for reconsideration of the judgment sent on 6 June 2024 was found to be out of time and was dismissed. The tribunal also refused to extend time for the application. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- 14-day reconsideration time limit
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.