Case 2603214/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Pawar v 1) Mr Darshan Kumar Sharma (DS) 2) AA Empire Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “AAE”) 3) Kabalous Hotel Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “KHL”) 4) Miss Helena Kubiczova (HK) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603214/2020
- Decision date
- 30 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote preliminary hearing by CVP before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone on 2 August 2021. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No further findings on the merits of that claim are recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay dismissed as out of time; the tribunal recorded that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for outstanding holiday pay dismissed as out of time; the tribunal recorded that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for outstanding wages dismissed as out of time; the tribunal recorded that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.